Tobia Ravà
that is, of the insatiable thirst
for knowledge, of the uncontrollable communicative throb
by Arturo Schwarz
For Marcel Duchamp a requirement came before all others:
art had to be at the service of the mind, and not be merely "retinal".
Let's remember the reasons that have motivated this belief. In the
last years of the eighteenth century and in the first years of the
last century artists were moving from a merely formal kind of experimentation
to another. The function of art, understood also as a conceptual exercise,
as an instrument of knowledge, had been forgotten, and the painter's
efforts were focused on improving the mimetic function of art. Therefore,
the Impressionists, reacting to the norm of painting in the studio
– which did not allow them to capture the real essence of nature
– would go to the countryside to capture the chromatic reality
of the subject. Then the Fauves arrived, who thought that what mattered
was not fidelity to colour, but, on the contrary, its exaltation,
giving it an autonomous value and exasperating its intensity and contrasts.
"No," said the Cubists, "what matters is not colour,
but structure," hence the neutral shades – browns and greys
– of the compositions of Braque, Picasso and Gris, amongst others.
Abstractionists took the field. "You are all wrong," they
said. "Neither colour nor structure are relevant, what matters
is the model. This should no longer be an exterior model, it is necessary
to free ourselves from the mimetic requirement, the model needs to
be interior." For the Expressionists, instead, colour and structure
were not relevant factors, what mattered was to capture all the drama
of the external model. But, of this reality, they captured only the
part that was visible, whereas the actual reality, which included
also the submerged part, which, as in the iceberg accounts for nine
tenths of it, remained inaccessible to them. Only with the Surrealists,
art received back its enlightening function. Remembering Freud's teachings,
they made it their aim to reveal the submerged part of the model as
well. From this stemmed their interest in dreams, altered physical-mental
states – for phenomena, in short, which allowed them to highlight
the manifestations of the unconscious. With the Surrealists, aesthetic
needs became of secondary importance, since what came first was the
desire to express, with the greatest authenticity possible, their
own dreams and desires, their own vision of the world. It's an accidental
fact, but not irrelevant, that such a requirement produced some of
the most important masterpieces of modern and contemporary art. What
matters, for the Surrealists, let us repeat, is fidelity to their
own internal self and, consequently, the initiatic and subversive
value of the work.
These are exactly the two main preoccupations of Tobia Ravà
– to put art at the service of the mind and to attribute it
an initiatic value. He manages to convey, through the simple use of
numbers and letters of the Hebrew alphabet, a message that isn't just
of extremely high aesthetic value, but also possesses a deep initiatic
value. It's been said that beauty coincides with truth and that truth
has a subversive charge because it is enlightening. We can see this,
as never before, in the works of our artist. And it's amazing how,
with his knowledgeable incursions in the ancient Kabbalistic art of
ghematriah – the technique that allows to find the secret correspondences
between some terms, deriving these equivalences from the numerical
value of the letters that compose them – Ravà managed
to create works of art which speak so well to our eyes and minds.
And this, even if the conceptual message has a subliminal character.
An example, amongst many, of Ravà's discoveries. The sum of
the numerical values of the letters that compose, in Hebrew, the names
of the four elements is the same that is obtained by adding up the
numerical values of the letters that compose the word "athanor"
– the crucible of the alchemist: esch (fire: 301) + maim (water:
90) + adama (earth: 50) + avir (air: 217) = 658. Batanur (crucible/melting
pot) = 658. Surprising also the work done by Ravà on the Fibonacci
sequence, the results of which he translated in works pos-sessing
transcendental value.
Concerning alchemy, let us remember that, in origin, its only purpose
was to attain complete knowledge of man – known as aurea apprehensio
– to free him from the slavery of ignorance. And this in accordance
with the instruction inscribed in the corridor of the temple of Apollo
at Delphi: gnothi seaton (know yourself). The ancient alchemists,
who operated before common times, did not tire of repeating it: "Our
gold is not the gold of the common people, it's the gold of golden
knowledge, of the aurea apprehensio". Only with the emergence
of Christian and Islamic alchemy a misunderstanding occurred, and
what was only a metaphor was understood literally! The true Kabbalist
had understood it well: the four elements stood for man – a
microcosm which includes the Whole, since man is the reflection of
the macrocosm, of the universe. While the crucible stood for the fire
of the alchemy teachings, for the longissima via to knowledge.
Let's return to ghematriah to clarify also that, in the Midrashic
and Kabbalist tradition, the universe was created with the help of
the letters of the Hebrew alphabet and in virtue of their numerical
values. But, even more so, in these traditions, the initiatic charge
of art came from the ability of the artist to create a work thanks
to the same technique. Hence, the biblical archetype of the artist,
Bezalel, managed to create a considerable work of art thanks to his
ability to "combine the letters such that the sky and the earth
were created" (Babylonian Talmud, Berakhot 55a).
To conclude, I would like to offer a last example, of how ghematriah
allows to discover archetypal truths. Ahavah (love) and ehad (unity)
have the same numerical value (13) to show that love means, precisely,
unity.
Thank you, dear friend, for letting us discover, again, that art is
not a mere formal exercise, the function of which is to produce works
to adorn living rooms. Art is not a divertissement but provokes, when
it really is art, an internal transformation, an enlightening emotion.
July 2008